Frahm, 2011E. Frahm, Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries. Origins of Interpretation. Ugarit-Verlag, 2011.: 43, 45, 73, 82-83, 88, 94-95, 123-26, 269, 331, 343, 356-59
Gabbay, 2014aU. Gabbay, “Actual Sense and Scriptural Intention: Literal Meaning and Its Terminology in Akkadian and Hebrew Commentaries”, in Encounters by the Rivers of Babylon: Scholarly Conversations between Jews, Iranians, and Babylonians, U. Gabbay and Secunda, S. , Eds. Mohr Siebeck, 2014, pp. 335-370.
[On line 4-5, ad F 8]: 355-356
Gabbay, 2016U. Gabbay, The Exegetical Terminology of Akkadian Commentaries. Brill, 2016.: 53 (10), 105 (12–13), 241 (1–2), 243 (18), 244 (17), 53, 233 (13), 108, 232 (12), 109, 243 (14), 163, 243 (11), 54, 55, 251 (9), 77, 108, 163 (7), 53, 62, 78, 82, 241 (8)
Lambert, 1999aW. G. Lambert, “Marduk's Address to the Demons”, in Mesopotamian Magic. Textual, Historical, and Interpretative Perspectives, T. Abusch and van der Toorn, K. , Eds. Styx, 1999, pp. 291-296.
[In addition to the published Assur commentary, there is also a small oblong tablet from the very same scribe commenting on two lines from this text, part of a quite different K commentary, and a section from a Late Babylonian commentary expounding every line, but entirely differently from the other commentaries.]: 291, 294