Broken
There is no proof that this small and badly damaged fragment from Babylon belongs to a text commentary, but the presence of a Glossenkeil dividing two apparently similar words in l. 7′ suggests that it might be one. If so, the base text is perhaps of medical or teratological character.
Powered by Oracc(Base text – Commentary – Quotations from other texts)
[...] ⸢x DU?-šú? x x⸣ [...]1
...
[...] ⸢KA⸣-šú ú-⸢x⸣-[...]
[...] ... his mouth [...]
[...] ⸢x x x x⸣ [...]
[...] ⸢x x x x⸣ [x x] ⸢x⸣ [...]
[...] ⸢x x x⸣ DUG₄.DUG₄ ⸢at⸣ [...]
[...] ... speaks ... [...]
[...] ⸢x BI x ku?-tal⸣-li-šú ú-⸢x⸣-[...]
[...] ... his back ... [...]
[... ina] SAG.DU-šú : ina SAG.⸢x⸣ [...]
[... “in] his head” means in the head ... [...]
[...]-⸢al?-li? x-at⸣ [...]
1Probably not [ina] ⸢SAG⸣.DU-šú.