Civil & Green & Lambert, 1979M. Civil, Green, M. W. , and Lambert, W. G. , Ea A = nâqu, Aa A = nâqu, with their Forerunners and Related Texts. Pontificium Institutum Biblicum, 1979.: 323-326 no. 10.1.4.2
ṣâtu 7a
CAD N/2 173a[On line o 18]
Civil & Green & Lambert, 1979M. Civil, Green, M. W. , and Lambert, W. G. , Ea A = nâqu, Aa A = nâqu, with their Forerunners and Related Texts. Pontificium Institutum Biblicum, 1979.[Edition]: 323-326 no. 10.1.4.2
Frahm, 2010dE. Frahm, “Reading the Tablet, the Exta, and the Body: The Hermeneutics of Cuneiform Signs in Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries and Divinatory Texts”, in Divination and interpretation of signs in the Ancient World, A. Annus, Ed. The University of Chicago, 2010, pp. 91-141.[ittu = miḫiṣtu]: 98 fn. 17
Frahm, 2011E. Frahm, Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries. Origins of Interpretation. Ugarit-Verlag, 2011.: 53, 96, 98-99, 101, 105-07, 109, 116, 243-46, 311
Gabbay, 2006U. Gabbay, “Emesal passages cited in commentaries”, N.A.B.U. Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires, vol. 2006/81, 2006.[Quotation from an Enlil Balag]
Gabbay, 2016U. Gabbay, The Exegetical Terminology of Akkadian Commentaries. Brill, 2016.: 75 (10, 15, 26, 34, 37), 135 (20, 24, r 24′, r 26′, 28, r 36′, 50, 14–15), 63, 135 (r 27′), 75, 135 (12, 17), 19, 66, 280